MQM-linked man’s case sheds light on burden of proof in asylum cases
LONDON: A recent Court of Appeal judgement considering the case of a Pakistani man linked to Muttahida Qaumi Movement-London (MQM-L) said asylum seekers don’t need “direct evidence” that they are being surveilled. The case centered on the application of an individual, who claimed he faced risk in Pakistan due to his involvement with the UK-based faction of Muttahida Qaumi Movement. The man has simply been identified by his initials, WAS. The Upper Tribunal earlier acknowledged that if his activities came to the attention of the Pakistani authorities, he would be at risk upon return but argued that there was insufficient evidence to determine the extent of monitoring of MQM-L’s activities. This made the applicant’s claim of potential identification speculative, and his appeal was consequently dismissed. Court rules applicants do not have to give direct evidence to show they are being watched Asylum applications go through a screening process at the Home Office, and, if rejected, ...